<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1317 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767931</link>
    <description>An appeal should not be dismissed solely for want of signature by an authorised signatory where the record already contains a board resolution authorising that person to institute, verify, sign and present proceedings before tax authorities and appellate fora. If the appellate authority had any doubt about the signatory&#039;s competence, it should first have sought clarification rather than reject the appeal outright. The dismissal was therefore quashed, and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication with prior notice, a personal hearing and a reasoned fresh order dealing with the appellant&#039;s submissions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1317 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767931</link>
      <description>An appeal should not be dismissed solely for want of signature by an authorised signatory where the record already contains a board resolution authorising that person to institute, verify, sign and present proceedings before tax authorities and appellate fora. If the appellate authority had any doubt about the signatory&#039;s competence, it should first have sought clarification rather than reject the appeal outright. The dismissal was therefore quashed, and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication with prior notice, a personal hearing and a reasoned fresh order dealing with the appellant&#039;s submissions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>