https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461299 CESTAT New Delhi rejected the application for condonation of 99-day delay in filing anti-dumping appeal. The applicant had previously filed an appeal in 2019 against similar anti-dumping duty orders, demonstrating awareness of appeal procedures. Despite knowledge of sunset review investigation, the applicant failed to participate in proceedings before the designated authority. The applicant did not provide satisfactory explanation for the delay, including specific dates of legal consultation or advice received. The tribunal found insufficient cause prevented timely filing within the stipulated period, resulting in dismissal of both the condonation application and the underlying anti-dumping appeal. en-us Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Mar 2025 17:26:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461299 CESTAT New Delhi rejected the application for condonation of 99-day delay in filing anti-dumping appeal. The applicant had previously filed an appeal in 2019 against similar anti-dumping duty orders, demonstrating awareness of appeal procedures. Despite knowledge of sunset review investigation, the applicant failed to participate in proceedings before the designated authority. The applicant did not provide satisfactory explanation for the delay, including specific dates of legal consultation or advice received. The tribunal found insufficient cause prevented timely filing within the stipulated period, resulting in dismissal of both the condonation application and the underlying anti-dumping appeal. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461299