<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 1393 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461300</link>
    <description>A writ petition seeking mandamus was entertained on the basis that a question of law had been raised, but no interim order was granted because the relief sought was treated as final rather than interlocutory. The matter was directed to proceed on affidavits, with liberty to file pleadings and for the respondent to consider any reply to the impugned show-cause notice in accordance with law during the pendency of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 1393 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461300</link>
      <description>A writ petition seeking mandamus was entertained on the basis that a question of law had been raised, but no interim order was granted because the relief sought was treated as final rather than interlocutory. The matter was directed to proceed on affidavits, with liberty to file pleadings and for the respondent to consider any reply to the impugned show-cause notice in accordance with law during the pendency of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>