https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42418 A 28-day delay in filing the appeal was held not to warrant condonation because the explanation was unsatisfactory, the supporting affidavit was stereotyped and incomplete, and reliance on inter-departmental processing was not treated as sufficient cause. The HC also examined the appeal on merits to confirm that refusal of condonation would not cause injustice, and found the challenge lacked substance. On that basis, the delay was not condoned and the motion was rejected. en-us Fri, 19 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Jun 2010 11:17:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42418 A 28-day delay in filing the appeal was held not to warrant condonation because the explanation was unsatisfactory, the supporting affidavit was stereotyped and incomplete, and reliance on inter-departmental processing was not treated as sufficient cause. The HC also examined the appeal on merits to confirm that refusal of condonation would not cause injustice, and found the challenge lacked substance. On that basis, the delay was not condoned and the motion was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 19 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42418