<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1526 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461284</link>
    <description>The ITAT Bangalore upheld depreciation adjustments for transfer pricing purposes, following precedent from the assessee&#039;s own case for A.Y. 2004-05 and Mumbai Tribunal&#039;s decision in Pangea 3 Legal Database Systems. The tribunal allowed exclusion of six comparable companies as functionally dissimilar and confirmed application of turnover filters. Regarding risk adjustment, while agreeing with the principle under Rule 10D, the tribunal modified CIT(A)&#039;s directions by requiring the assessee to provide comprehensive information to AO/TPO for computing risk differentials between the assessee and comparables to determine appropriate adjustments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 15:47:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1526 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461284</link>
      <description>The ITAT Bangalore upheld depreciation adjustments for transfer pricing purposes, following precedent from the assessee&#039;s own case for A.Y. 2004-05 and Mumbai Tribunal&#039;s decision in Pangea 3 Legal Database Systems. The tribunal allowed exclusion of six comparable companies as functionally dissimilar and confirmed application of turnover filters. Regarding risk adjustment, while agreeing with the principle under Rule 10D, the tribunal modified CIT(A)&#039;s directions by requiring the assessee to provide comprehensive information to AO/TPO for computing risk differentials between the assessee and comparables to determine appropriate adjustments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>