<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (1) TMI 70 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42399</link>
    <description>Zinc callots made by punching zinc strips into circular or hexagonal shapes were treated as goods covered by the specific tariff description for zinc strips in any form or size. Prior departmental classification practice supported continued treatment under the specific entry, and the product&#039;s manufacture and commercial identity were considered consistent with that entry. The later separate specification of callots was read as confirming, rather than displacing, that construction. The residuary tariff item was therefore not appropriate where the goods remained within the scope of the specific description.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:04:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (1) TMI 70 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42399</link>
      <description>Zinc callots made by punching zinc strips into circular or hexagonal shapes were treated as goods covered by the specific tariff description for zinc strips in any form or size. Prior departmental classification practice supported continued treatment under the specific entry, and the product&#039;s manufacture and commercial identity were considered consistent with that entry. The later separate specification of callots was read as confirming, rather than displacing, that construction. The residuary tariff item was therefore not appropriate where the goods remained within the scope of the specific description.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>