<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (10) TMI 46 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42395</link>
    <description>Attachment and recovery proceedings were sustained where an assessment memorandum and demand notice formed the basis of recovery, even though final adjudication of the excise demand was still pending. The court noted that the dispute over the demand and proposed penalty could be pursued before the competent excise authorities, and that prior issuance of cheques, some of which were dishonoured, supported continuation of recovery action. No ground was found to interfere with the attachment at that stage, and the petition was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:53:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (10) TMI 46 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42395</link>
      <description>Attachment and recovery proceedings were sustained where an assessment memorandum and demand notice formed the basis of recovery, even though final adjudication of the excise demand was still pending. The court noted that the dispute over the demand and proposed penalty could be pursued before the competent excise authorities, and that prior issuance of cheques, some of which were dishonoured, supported continuation of recovery action. No ground was found to interfere with the attachment at that stage, and the petition was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>