<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1194 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767808</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata allowed the appeal, holding that the adjudicating authority&#039;s failure to consider judicial pronouncements and circulars while finalizing shipping bills constituted a clerical error under Section 154 of the Customs Act, 1962. The tribunal ruled that omission to assess bills after noting relevant legal decisions amounts to an error requiring rectification. The authority was directed to determine Fe content on WMT basis instead of DMT basis and pass appropriate orders. The impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 06:50:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1194 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767808</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata allowed the appeal, holding that the adjudicating authority&#039;s failure to consider judicial pronouncements and circulars while finalizing shipping bills constituted a clerical error under Section 154 of the Customs Act, 1962. The tribunal ruled that omission to assess bills after noting relevant legal decisions amounts to an error requiring rectification. The authority was directed to determine Fe content on WMT basis instead of DMT basis and pass appropriate orders. The impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>