https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767814 CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal in part regarding customs broker license revocation. The tribunal found insufficient evidence to establish conspiracy or breach of regulations 10(d) and 10(e) of Customs Broker Licensing Regulations, 2018. While drawback claims by exporters exceeded eligibility, the broker's failure to file declarations was deemed a technical irregularity not warranting severe penalties. The tribunal set aside license revocation and security deposit forfeiture but upheld the penalty under regulation 18, concluding the violations were not of sufficient magnitude to justify maximum sanctions available to licensing authorities. en-us Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Mar 2025 06:50:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767814 CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal in part regarding customs broker license revocation. The tribunal found insufficient evidence to establish conspiracy or breach of regulations 10(d) and 10(e) of Customs Broker Licensing Regulations, 2018. While drawback claims by exporters exceeded eligibility, the broker's failure to file declarations was deemed a technical irregularity not warranting severe penalties. The tribunal set aside license revocation and security deposit forfeiture but upheld the penalty under regulation 18, concluding the violations were not of sufficient magnitude to justify maximum sanctions available to licensing authorities. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767814