<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1202 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767816</link>
    <description>Delhi HC quashed Order-in-Original dated 30th March 2024 issued pursuant to show cause notice from 30th December 2014, citing excessive delay of nearly ten years. Court held that statutory flexibility does not sanction lethargy, and authorities must establish genuine hindrance preventing reasonable expedition. Following precedent in Vos Technologies case, HC ruled the delay unsustainable and set aside proceedings against petitioners, disposing of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 06:50:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1202 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767816</link>
      <description>Delhi HC quashed Order-in-Original dated 30th March 2024 issued pursuant to show cause notice from 30th December 2014, citing excessive delay of nearly ten years. Court held that statutory flexibility does not sanction lethargy, and authorities must establish genuine hindrance preventing reasonable expedition. Following precedent in Vos Technologies case, HC ruled the delay unsustainable and set aside proceedings against petitioners, disposing of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>