https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767817 The HC directed the Petitioners to pursue an appellate remedy before CESTAT regarding the Order-in-Original, which ordered the confiscation of goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The Court did not assess the merits of the Petitioners' arguments, allowing all objections to be addressed by CESTAT. The pre-deposit requirement for the appeal was reduced to 3.75%, specific to this case and not as a precedent. The Court noted the Petitioners' argument about the denial of cross-examination of ICAR scientists but left its relevance to be determined by CESTAT during the appeal. All petitions and pending applications were disposed of with these directions. en-us Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Mar 2025 06:50:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767817 The HC directed the Petitioners to pursue an appellate remedy before CESTAT regarding the Order-in-Original, which ordered the confiscation of goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The Court did not assess the merits of the Petitioners' arguments, allowing all objections to be addressed by CESTAT. The pre-deposit requirement for the appeal was reduced to 3.75%, specific to this case and not as a precedent. The Court noted the Petitioners' argument about the denial of cross-examination of ICAR scientists but left its relevance to be determined by CESTAT during the appeal. All petitions and pending applications were disposed of with these directions. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767817