<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1231 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767845</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court noted that appeals filed in 2013 were governed by Instruction No. 3 of 2011, which contained no TDS exception. Circular No. 5 of 2024 introduced a TDS exception later, but the Court reiterated that this exception does not apply retrospectively, although the enhanced tax effect ceiling may apply to pending appeals. On that basis, the earlier withdrawal or disposal of the appeal was treated as proper, and restoration was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 06:50:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1231 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767845</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court noted that appeals filed in 2013 were governed by Instruction No. 3 of 2011, which contained no TDS exception. Circular No. 5 of 2024 introduced a TDS exception later, but the Court reiterated that this exception does not apply retrospectively, although the enhanced tax effect ceiling may apply to pending appeals. On that basis, the earlier withdrawal or disposal of the appeal was treated as proper, and restoration was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>