https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767846 The Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal's findings that were supported by evidence and not based on conjectures. It concluded that the Tribunal did not err in sustaining the addition of Rs. 2,00,50,000/- to the Appellant's income, as the Appellant failed to correlate the seized cash with declared income. The Court also found no error in the Tribunal's rejection of the principle of telescoping, as the Appellant could not establish a connection between unexplained income and expenditures. No substantial question of law was found, and the appeal was dismissed without costs. en-us Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Mar 2025 06:50:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767846 The Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal's findings that were supported by evidence and not based on conjectures. It concluded that the Tribunal did not err in sustaining the addition of Rs. 2,00,50,000/- to the Appellant's income, as the Appellant failed to correlate the seized cash with declared income. The Court also found no error in the Tribunal's rejection of the principle of telescoping, as the Appellant could not establish a connection between unexplained income and expenditures. No substantial question of law was found, and the appeal was dismissed without costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767846