<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1234 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767848</link>
    <description>A petition seeking release of a sanctioned loan and challenging an alleged illegal seizure for want of hearing was withdrawn before merits were pressed. The respondent objected to the petition as a misuse of process and opposed the GST-related prayer, but no substantive adjudication was undertaken because the petitioners sought withdrawal. The petition was therefore dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for, leaving the underlying natural justice and seizure issues unresolved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1234 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767848</link>
      <description>A petition seeking release of a sanctioned loan and challenging an alleged illegal seizure for want of hearing was withdrawn before merits were pressed. The respondent objected to the petition as a misuse of process and opposed the GST-related prayer, but no substantive adjudication was undertaken because the petitioners sought withdrawal. The petition was therefore dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for, leaving the underlying natural justice and seizure issues unresolved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>