<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (5) TMI 46 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42378</link>
    <description>Coercive recovery of a disputed excise duty demand may be restrained while an appeal remains pending, where the appellate challenge is active and adequate security is already in place. The protection can be made conditional on the petitioner maintaining a valid bank guarantee from a nationalised bank for the period of pendency, and no fresh guarantee is required if the existing guarantee satisfies that condition. The operative effect is conditional stay of recovery until final disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:02:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (5) TMI 46 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42378</link>
      <description>Coercive recovery of a disputed excise duty demand may be restrained while an appeal remains pending, where the appellate challenge is active and adequate security is already in place. The protection can be made conditional on the petitioner maintaining a valid bank guarantee from a nationalised bank for the period of pendency, and no fresh guarantee is required if the existing guarantee satisfies that condition. The operative effect is conditional stay of recovery until final disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>