<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>PM-CARE fund more transparent than UPA&#039;s PM relief fund: Shah</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=38545</link>
    <description>The article contrasts alleged opacity in the Prime Minister&#039;s Relief Fund-characterised by control by a single family, involvement of a political party president, PSU contributions to a linked foundation, and absence of a utilisation-review committee-with the PM-CARE Fund&#039;s structured governance including senior-minister trusteeship, a five-secretary expenditure review committee, and use of funds for pandemic-related infrastructure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 19:16:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 19:16:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=809035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>PM-CARE fund more transparent than UPA&#039;s PM relief fund: Shah</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=38545</link>
      <description>The article contrasts alleged opacity in the Prime Minister&#039;s Relief Fund-characterised by control by a single family, involvement of a political party president, PSU contributions to a linked foundation, and absence of a utilisation-review committee-with the PM-CARE Fund&#039;s structured governance including senior-minister trusteeship, a five-secretary expenditure review committee, and use of funds for pandemic-related infrastructure.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 19:16:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=38545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>