<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 1045 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461262</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the land sold by the assessee in Egathur and Navalur villages qualified as agricultural land, thereby exempting it from capital gains tax under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It rejected the Commissioner&#039;s reliance on a State Government order, affirming that no statutory notification reclassified the land as urban. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s exemption claim under section 54EC, finding sufficient evidence that the investment in NABARD bonds was made from the sale proceeds. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s revision order, affirming the original assessment by the Assessing Officer. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 17:18:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=808990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 1045 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461262</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the land sold by the assessee in Egathur and Navalur villages qualified as agricultural land, thereby exempting it from capital gains tax under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It rejected the Commissioner&#039;s reliance on a State Government order, affirming that no statutory notification reclassified the land as urban. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s exemption claim under section 54EC, finding sufficient evidence that the investment in NABARD bonds was made from the sale proceeds. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s revision order, affirming the original assessment by the Assessing Officer. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>