<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (8) TMI 107 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42362</link>
    <description>A show cause notice issued against an individual was quashed because it did not disclose a jurisdictional basis on its face for proceeding against him for the relevant period. The court held that a public notice must stand or fall on the reasons stated in it, and any defect cannot be cured by fresh factual explanations in affidavit. As the admitted material showed that he joined the company after the period covered by the notice, the notice itself failed to establish his connection with the alleged contravention during that period. The jurisdictional basis was therefore absent, and the notice was quashed insofar as he was concerned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:12:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (8) TMI 107 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42362</link>
      <description>A show cause notice issued against an individual was quashed because it did not disclose a jurisdictional basis on its face for proceeding against him for the relevant period. The court held that a public notice must stand or fall on the reasons stated in it, and any defect cannot be cured by fresh factual explanations in affidavit. As the admitted material showed that he joined the company after the period covered by the notice, the notice itself failed to establish his connection with the alleged contravention during that period. The jurisdictional basis was therefore absent, and the notice was quashed insofar as he was concerned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>