<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Lease Agreements for Fitouts Qualify as &quot;Deemed Sale&quot; Under Article 366(29A), Not Taxable Service</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86799</link>
    <description>CESTAT held that lease agreements for fitouts constituted a &quot;deemed sale&quot; under Article 366(29A) of the Constitution rather than a taxable service. The tribunal affirmed the Commissioner&#039;s findings that the goods were identifiable, available for delivery, and leased to the respondents for exclusive use. The Commissioner properly applied the Supreme Court&#039;s Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd test in determining that VAT had been correctly paid on these transactions. The tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument regarding dominant nature of the transaction, concluding that once a transaction qualifies as a deemed sale, service tax liability does not arise. The department&#039;s appeal was accordingly dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 08:48:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 08:48:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=808851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Lease Agreements for Fitouts Qualify as &quot;Deemed Sale&quot; Under Article 366(29A), Not Taxable Service</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86799</link>
      <description>CESTAT held that lease agreements for fitouts constituted a &quot;deemed sale&quot; under Article 366(29A) of the Constitution rather than a taxable service. The tribunal affirmed the Commissioner&#039;s findings that the goods were identifiable, available for delivery, and leased to the respondents for exclusive use. The Commissioner properly applied the Supreme Court&#039;s Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd test in determining that VAT had been correctly paid on these transactions. The tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument regarding dominant nature of the transaction, concluding that once a transaction qualifies as a deemed sale, service tax liability does not arise. The department&#039;s appeal was accordingly dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 08:48:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>