<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1139 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767753</link>
    <description>Aircraft maintenance engineering training conducted by a DGCA-approved institute under the aircraft regulatory framework was treated as a qualification recognised by law, so the training did not fall within commercial training or coaching service for the relevant period and was not taxable. Maintenance and repair charges recovered by a members&#039; club for aircraft owned by its members, where the work was undertaken only for members and no independent service consideration was charged beyond reimbursement of cost, attracted the doctrine of mutuality; in the absence of a real taxable service transaction, the levy was not sustainable. The demands on both categories were therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 13:16:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=808844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1139 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767753</link>
      <description>Aircraft maintenance engineering training conducted by a DGCA-approved institute under the aircraft regulatory framework was treated as a qualification recognised by law, so the training did not fall within commercial training or coaching service for the relevant period and was not taxable. Maintenance and repair charges recovered by a members&#039; club for aircraft owned by its members, where the work was undertaken only for members and no independent service consideration was charged beyond reimbursement of cost, attracted the doctrine of mutuality; in the absence of a real taxable service transaction, the levy was not sustainable. The demands on both categories were therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>