https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767763 Petitioners challenging an Order-in-Original over diversion of imported walnuts into the domestic market were relegated to the statutory remedy before CESTAT, as the High Court did not examine the merits or the alleged denial of personal hearing. All objections were kept open for adjudication in the appeal. In the unique facts of the matter, the pre-deposit for filing the appeal was reduced to 3.75%, and the order was stated not to operate as a precedent. en-us Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:08:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767763 Petitioners challenging an Order-in-Original over diversion of imported walnuts into the domestic market were relegated to the statutory remedy before CESTAT, as the High Court did not examine the merits or the alleged denial of personal hearing. All objections were kept open for adjudication in the appeal. In the unique facts of the matter, the pre-deposit for filing the appeal was reduced to 3.75%, and the order was stated not to operate as a precedent. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767763