<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1169 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767783</link>
    <description>The Court held that the Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal as not maintainable, emphasizing that an open remand under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act allows for fresh consideration of the merits without necessitating a separate challenge. The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, restoring the appeal for fresh consideration and directing the Tribunal to dispose of the appeal in accordance with the law. This decision favored the assessee, allowing the appeal against the revenue to proceed on its merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 08:48:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=808814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1169 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767783</link>
      <description>The Court held that the Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal as not maintainable, emphasizing that an open remand under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act allows for fresh consideration of the merits without necessitating a separate challenge. The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, restoring the appeal for fresh consideration and directing the Tribunal to dispose of the appeal in accordance with the law. This decision favored the assessee, allowing the appeal against the revenue to proceed on its merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>