<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1175 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767789</link>
    <description>The HC held that simultaneous proceedings by Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 under Section 73 of the KGST Act for the same financial year were impermissible, quashed the impugned orders of both officers, and reserved liberty for Respondent No. 5 to proceed in accordance with law. The matter was remitted to Respondent No. 5 for fresh consideration up to the stage of replying to the Show Cause Notice dated 30.05.2024. The petition was allowed by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 14:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=808808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1175 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767789</link>
      <description>The HC held that simultaneous proceedings by Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 under Section 73 of the KGST Act for the same financial year were impermissible, quashed the impugned orders of both officers, and reserved liberty for Respondent No. 5 to proceed in accordance with law. The matter was remitted to Respondent No. 5 for fresh consideration up to the stage of replying to the Show Cause Notice dated 30.05.2024. The petition was allowed by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>