<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (5) TMI 45 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42345</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming that Customs Officers had sufficient grounds to believe the diamonds were smuggled based on discrepancies and lack of evidence provided by the petitioners. The court found the petitioners failed to meet the burden of proof under Section 123 of the Customs Act by submitting inadequate and questionable affidavits. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed, and the Tribunal&#039;s order was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:13:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (5) TMI 45 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42345</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming that Customs Officers had sufficient grounds to believe the diamonds were smuggled based on discrepancies and lack of evidence provided by the petitioners. The court found the petitioners failed to meet the burden of proof under Section 123 of the Customs Act by submitting inadequate and questionable affidavits. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed, and the Tribunal&#039;s order was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>