<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (8) TMI 80 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42344</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction was declined in a customs classification dispute, and the parties were directed to pursue adjudication before the Customs Authorities through a show cause notice process. The petition was not entertained on the merits, and the matter was left for final determination by the departmental authority. Pending that adjudication, the bank guarantee and undertakings were ordered to continue until completion of the classification decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:10:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (8) TMI 80 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42344</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction was declined in a customs classification dispute, and the parties were directed to pursue adjudication before the Customs Authorities through a show cause notice process. The petition was not entertained on the merits, and the matter was left for final determination by the departmental authority. Pending that adjudication, the bank guarantee and undertakings were ordered to continue until completion of the classification decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>