<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (8) TMI 66 - HIGH COURT AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42342</link>
    <description>Parliament may enact retrospective fiscal validation legislation and cure defects in an earlier exemption notification, even where prior judicial interpretation had favoured taxpayers. The retrospective exemption scheme and production-based ceiling were treated as a permissible fiscal classification, because exemption is a concession that may be limited to the intended small-scale sector on a rational output criterion. The retrospective measure was also held not to violate Article 14, the business freedom guarantees, or property rights, and promissory estoppel could not block a competent retrospective validating law. The earlier writ-based refund consequence therefore did not survive, and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:03:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (8) TMI 66 - HIGH COURT AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42342</link>
      <description>Parliament may enact retrospective fiscal validation legislation and cure defects in an earlier exemption notification, even where prior judicial interpretation had favoured taxpayers. The retrospective exemption scheme and production-based ceiling were treated as a permissible fiscal classification, because exemption is a concession that may be limited to the intended small-scale sector on a rational output criterion. The retrospective measure was also held not to violate Article 14, the business freedom guarantees, or property rights, and promissory estoppel could not block a competent retrospective validating law. The earlier writ-based refund consequence therefore did not survive, and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>