https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42333 The court rejected the petition, stating that the Petitioners, who had recovered excise duty from their customers, were not entitled to a refund. The court emphasized the principle against unjust enrichment and cited previous Supreme Court decisions to support its decision. The court also highlighted the discretionary nature of relief under Article 226 of the Constitution. en-us Wed, 06 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:25:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42333 The court rejected the petition, stating that the Petitioners, who had recovered excise duty from their customers, were not entitled to a refund. The court emphasized the principle against unjust enrichment and cited previous Supreme Court decisions to support its decision. The court also highlighted the discretionary nature of relief under Article 226 of the Constitution. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42333