<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (7) TMI 63 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42332</link>
    <description>A taxing exemption notification must be construed strictly on its plain language, with no intendment or implied conditions. Clauses (a) and (b) of Notification No. 33/81 were distinct and disjunctive, so the duty-paid requirement in clause (a) could not be read into clause (b) through the words &quot;the said&quot;. On that construction, imported lead scrap fell within clause (b) and qualified for exemption from excise duty, with refund of duty paid under protest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:23:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (7) TMI 63 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42332</link>
      <description>A taxing exemption notification must be construed strictly on its plain language, with no intendment or implied conditions. Clauses (a) and (b) of Notification No. 33/81 were distinct and disjunctive, so the duty-paid requirement in clause (a) could not be read into clause (b) through the words &quot;the said&quot;. On that construction, imported lead scrap fell within clause (b) and qualified for exemption from excise duty, with refund of duty paid under protest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>