https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767718 Where a writ petition is expressly confined to a challenge against the remand-related custody order, the Court will not permit the petitioner to reopen the legality of the earlier arrest. It treated the recorded confinement of prayer as binding and declined to enlarge the scope of review beyond the confined relief. The Court further distinguished arrest from remand, noting that statutory safeguards under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act operate at the arrest stage, while remand is governed separately under the Code of Criminal Procedure. Finding no procedural illegality or jurisdictional defect in the custody order, it held that no ground for interference was made out. en-us Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Mar 2025 08:45:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767718 Where a writ petition is expressly confined to a challenge against the remand-related custody order, the Court will not permit the petitioner to reopen the legality of the earlier arrest. It treated the recorded confinement of prayer as binding and declined to enlarge the scope of review beyond the confined relief. The Court further distinguished arrest from remand, noting that statutory safeguards under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act operate at the arrest stage, while remand is governed separately under the Code of Criminal Procedure. Finding no procedural illegality or jurisdictional defect in the custody order, it held that no ground for interference was made out. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767718