<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1113 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767727</link>
    <description>The first appellate authority upheld the penalty order but failed to adjudicate the specific grounds challenging the levy of penalty under section 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, dealing only with the grounds relating to section 270AA. Because the core penalty challenge remained unexamined, the matter required fresh consideration in accordance with law. The appeal was restored to the first appellate authority for a new decision on the unanswered grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 08:45:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=808517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1113 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767727</link>
      <description>The first appellate authority upheld the penalty order but failed to adjudicate the specific grounds challenging the levy of penalty under section 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, dealing only with the grounds relating to section 270AA. Because the core penalty challenge remained unexamined, the matter required fresh consideration in accordance with law. The appeal was restored to the first appellate authority for a new decision on the unanswered grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>