<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1114 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767728</link>
    <description>ITAT PUNE held that CIT(E) was unjustified in rejecting the application for registration and cancelling provisional registration under section 80G(5). The Revenue failed to provide contrary material or judicial precedent. In the interest of justice, the matter was restored to CIT(E) with directions to reconsider the registration application on merits. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 08:45:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=808516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1114 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767728</link>
      <description>ITAT PUNE held that CIT(E) was unjustified in rejecting the application for registration and cancelling provisional registration under section 80G(5). The Revenue failed to provide contrary material or judicial precedent. In the interest of justice, the matter was restored to CIT(E) with directions to reconsider the registration application on merits. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>