<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1116 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767730</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad allowed partial relief to assessee in unexplained income case. Court deleted additions u/s 69A for cash deposits, holding that withdrawals from bank accounts presumed available for re-deposit without contrary evidence. Additions for sale of Renault and Santro cars deleted as purchaser details were provided, non-response to notices insufficient basis. However, sustained additions for Mercedes Benz car sale due to lack of evidence supporting genuineness, joint venture contribution u/s 68 for insufficient creditworthiness proof, and bogus share sale u/s 69A where purchaser company&#039;s cash availability remained unestablished despite multiple opportunities provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 08:45:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=808514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1116 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767730</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad allowed partial relief to assessee in unexplained income case. Court deleted additions u/s 69A for cash deposits, holding that withdrawals from bank accounts presumed available for re-deposit without contrary evidence. Additions for sale of Renault and Santro cars deleted as purchaser details were provided, non-response to notices insufficient basis. However, sustained additions for Mercedes Benz car sale due to lack of evidence supporting genuineness, joint venture contribution u/s 68 for insufficient creditworthiness proof, and bogus share sale u/s 69A where purchaser company&#039;s cash availability remained unestablished despite multiple opportunities provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>