<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1124 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767738</link>
    <description>Delhi HC held that a charitable trust&#039;s purchase of shares in BARC, a Section 25 company and 100% subsidiary, did not constitute &quot;investment&quot; under Section 11(5) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act. The court ruled that since BARC was legally prohibited from distributing dividends and any surplus upon liquidation would transfer to another charitable entity, the deployment of funds lacked the essential feature of investment - intention to earn return or profit. The transaction was made to fulfill statutory obligations and charitable objectives, not for income generation. Consequently, the trust&#039;s exemption under Sections 11 and 12 was upheld, deciding against the revenue department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=808506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1124 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767738</link>
      <description>Delhi HC held that a charitable trust&#039;s purchase of shares in BARC, a Section 25 company and 100% subsidiary, did not constitute &quot;investment&quot; under Section 11(5) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act. The court ruled that since BARC was legally prohibited from distributing dividends and any surplus upon liquidation would transfer to another charitable entity, the deployment of funds lacked the essential feature of investment - intention to earn return or profit. The transaction was made to fulfill statutory obligations and charitable objectives, not for income generation. Consequently, the trust&#039;s exemption under Sections 11 and 12 was upheld, deciding against the revenue department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>