<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1125 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767739</link>
    <description>GST refund claimed in relation to a contract was not decided on merits; the HC directed State authorities to verify the facts and the petitioner&#039;s entitlement, then process the refund claim and take a decision within 90 days. The ruling required administrative consideration of the refund request rather than immediate grant of relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 08:45:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=808505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1125 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767739</link>
      <description>GST refund claimed in relation to a contract was not decided on merits; the HC directed State authorities to verify the facts and the petitioner&#039;s entitlement, then process the refund claim and take a decision within 90 days. The ruling required administrative consideration of the refund request rather than immediate grant of relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>