<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1130 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767744</link>
    <description>HC set aside the impugned order under CGST Act, remanding the case for fresh consideration. The court allowed the petitioner to submit additional documents and apply for Amnesty Scheme benefits under Section 128A after tax liability quantification. The decision emphasizes procedural fairness, directing the respondent to reconsider the case within a stipulated timeframe and provide the petitioner an opportunity to present complete evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 17:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=808500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1130 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767744</link>
      <description>HC set aside the impugned order under CGST Act, remanding the case for fresh consideration. The court allowed the petitioner to submit additional documents and apply for Amnesty Scheme benefits under Section 128A after tax liability quantification. The decision emphasizes procedural fairness, directing the respondent to reconsider the case within a stipulated timeframe and provide the petitioner an opportunity to present complete evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>