<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 115 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42321</link>
    <description>The court upheld the petitioners&#039; classification of Cotton Linters Pulp under entry No. 43(1) of the Indian Tariff Act, rejecting the government&#039;s classification as filter paper under entry No. 44. The court emphasized the importance of statutory clarity and commercial understanding in determining the classification of goods, ruling in favor of the petitioners and granting them a refund with interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:09:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 115 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42321</link>
      <description>The court upheld the petitioners&#039; classification of Cotton Linters Pulp under entry No. 43(1) of the Indian Tariff Act, rejecting the government&#039;s classification as filter paper under entry No. 44. The court emphasized the importance of statutory clarity and commercial understanding in determining the classification of goods, ruling in favor of the petitioners and granting them a refund with interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>