<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1132 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767746</link>
    <description>Strong prima facie challenge to GST-related notifications justified interim protection, where the Court noted that similar writ petitions had already been entertained and interim relief granted on the view that the notifications may have required GST Council recommendation. The Court accordingly stayed the impugned order, restrained recovery and further effect to it, and directed that the amount already deposited remain as deposit until further orders or disposal of the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 15:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=808498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1132 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767746</link>
      <description>Strong prima facie challenge to GST-related notifications justified interim protection, where the Court noted that similar writ petitions had already been entertained and interim relief granted on the view that the notifications may have required GST Council recommendation. The Court accordingly stayed the impugned order, restrained recovery and further effect to it, and directed that the amount already deposited remain as deposit until further orders or disposal of the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>