https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42310 A Magistrate may consider a remand request and a bail application together even if the accused is not physically produced, because personal presence at remand is a rule of caution rather than an absolute requirement. Where the prosecution itself seeks remand, no separate fresh notice for the bail application is required merely because both matters are heard together. Non-disclosure of earlier bail proceedings will not, by itself, amount to fraud on the court; cancellation or invalidation of bail requires proven fraud, deliberate suppression, or abuse of process. The document therefore states that concurrent consideration of remand and bail is permissible and that alleged omission must reach the level of vitiating misconduct before bail can be disturbed. en-us Mon, 11 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:43:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42310 A Magistrate may consider a remand request and a bail application together even if the accused is not physically produced, because personal presence at remand is a rule of caution rather than an absolute requirement. Where the prosecution itself seeks remand, no separate fresh notice for the bail application is required merely because both matters are heard together. Non-disclosure of earlier bail proceedings will not, by itself, amount to fraud on the court; cancellation or invalidation of bail requires proven fraud, deliberate suppression, or abuse of process. The document therefore states that concurrent consideration of remand and bail is permissible and that alleged omission must reach the level of vitiating misconduct before bail can be disturbed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 11 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42310