<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>PF Contributions Deposited Late Not Deductible, But Interest on Strategic Investment Loans Allowed Under Income Tax Act</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86759</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed the Department&#039;s appeal regarding late deposit of employees&#039; PF contributions, following the Supreme Court&#039;s Checkmate Services precedent. The Tribunal dismissed Revenue&#039;s grounds concerning disallowance of interest on unneeded loans, finding the investment in Ethiopotash B.V. was directly linked to the assessee&#039;s business to control raw material supply. ITAT upheld CIT(A)&#039;s findings against rejection of books under s.145(3), determining the AO failed to properly verify submitted information before estimation. The Tribunal allowed full-year depreciation despite partial plant operation, following precedent on the wear and tear concept. ITAT also dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeals regarding additions under s.68 for alleged bogus share applications and unsecured loans, as the assessee adequately established identity, creditworthiness, and transaction genuineness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2025 08:34:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2025 08:34:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=808335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>PF Contributions Deposited Late Not Deductible, But Interest on Strategic Investment Loans Allowed Under Income Tax Act</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86759</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed the Department&#039;s appeal regarding late deposit of employees&#039; PF contributions, following the Supreme Court&#039;s Checkmate Services precedent. The Tribunal dismissed Revenue&#039;s grounds concerning disallowance of interest on unneeded loans, finding the investment in Ethiopotash B.V. was directly linked to the assessee&#039;s business to control raw material supply. ITAT upheld CIT(A)&#039;s findings against rejection of books under s.145(3), determining the AO failed to properly verify submitted information before estimation. The Tribunal allowed full-year depreciation despite partial plant operation, following precedent on the wear and tear concept. ITAT also dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeals regarding additions under s.68 for alleged bogus share applications and unsecured loans, as the assessee adequately established identity, creditworthiness, and transaction genuineness.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2025 08:34:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>