https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767668 A remand should not be ordered as a routine course when the appellate record already contains the material needed to decide both jurisdictional and substantive issues. The question whether a claim amounts to a debt under Section 2(g) of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 is a legal issue that can be determined on the existing record. An appellate forum should ordinarily decide the appeal finally where no fresh trial is required; remand is justified only if a retrial is necessary or remand is imperative in the interest of justice. en-us Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Mar 2025 14:52:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767668 A remand should not be ordered as a routine course when the appellate record already contains the material needed to decide both jurisdictional and substantive issues. The question whether a claim amounts to a debt under Section 2(g) of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 is a legal issue that can be determined on the existing record. An appellate forum should ordinarily decide the appeal finally where no fresh trial is required; remand is justified only if a retrial is necessary or remand is imperative in the interest of justice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767668