<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1068 - COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767682</link>
    <description>A procurer may set procurement requirements and tender terms according to its needs, and such terms do not become anti-competitive or abusive merely because they are restrictive or disputed. The CCI found no material showing collusion, bid rigging, or any other prohibited agreement, so no prima facie contravention of the prohibition on anti-competitive agreements was made out. It also held that selection or non-selection of an agency, or a restrictive request for proposal, does not by itself establish abuse of dominance unless the statutory ingredients are otherwise shown. In the absence of supporting material, the matter was closed at the threshold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2025 08:34:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=808299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1068 - COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767682</link>
      <description>A procurer may set procurement requirements and tender terms according to its needs, and such terms do not become anti-competitive or abusive merely because they are restrictive or disputed. The CCI found no material showing collusion, bid rigging, or any other prohibited agreement, so no prima facie contravention of the prohibition on anti-competitive agreements was made out. It also held that selection or non-selection of an agency, or a restrictive request for proposal, does not by itself establish abuse of dominance unless the statutory ingredients are otherwise shown. In the absence of supporting material, the matter was closed at the threshold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>