<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1050 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767664</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad ruled on two Section 68 additions. For loans from friends and relatives, the tribunal found the assessee successfully established the identity, creditworthiness, and source of loan amounts from the brother through filed returns, confirmation letters, and business details. The addition was deleted as no violation under Section 69A was established. For unexplained cash deposits from foreign employment incentives, despite missing documentation like Angola tax returns and passport details, the tribunal noted the assessee provided employment letters and currency exchange details. Since the AO failed to conduct independent verification of the currency exchanger, the matter was remanded for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2025 08:34:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=808272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1050 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767664</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad ruled on two Section 68 additions. For loans from friends and relatives, the tribunal found the assessee successfully established the identity, creditworthiness, and source of loan amounts from the brother through filed returns, confirmation letters, and business details. The addition was deleted as no violation under Section 69A was established. For unexplained cash deposits from foreign employment incentives, despite missing documentation like Angola tax returns and passport details, the tribunal noted the assessee provided employment letters and currency exchange details. Since the AO failed to conduct independent verification of the currency exchanger, the matter was remanded for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>