<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (2) TMI 74 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42297</link>
    <description>The Court directed the Customs Authorities to cancel the supplementary manifest and allow transhipment of goods to Bombay. Port Trust Authorities were not entitled to claim demurrages due to the canceled manifest. Petitioners were instructed to pay Rs. 2,00,000 to Calcutta Port Trust for Port rent/demurrages, leading to the release of goods for transhipment. The application was disposed with instructions for compliance with the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:03:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (2) TMI 74 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42297</link>
      <description>The Court directed the Customs Authorities to cancel the supplementary manifest and allow transhipment of goods to Bombay. Port Trust Authorities were not entitled to claim demurrages due to the canceled manifest. Petitioners were instructed to pay Rs. 2,00,000 to Calcutta Port Trust for Port rent/demurrages, leading to the release of goods for transhipment. The application was disposed with instructions for compliance with the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>