https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461225 An arbitration clause does not, by itself, oust consumer forum jurisdiction where a homebuyer's claim falls under consumer protection law, because that statute supplies a special beneficial remedy and consumer disputes are treated as excluded from private adjudication by necessary implication. The 2015 amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act narrow judicial scrutiny under Sections 8 and 11 to the existence of an arbitration agreement, but they do not override settled non-arbitrability principles or compel reference of a dispute governed by a special statutory forum chosen by the consumer. The same reasoning applies to a request for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11. en-us Thu, 05 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Mar 2025 08:33:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461225 An arbitration clause does not, by itself, oust consumer forum jurisdiction where a homebuyer's claim falls under consumer protection law, because that statute supplies a special beneficial remedy and consumer disputes are treated as excluded from private adjudication by necessary implication. The 2015 amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act narrow judicial scrutiny under Sections 8 and 11 to the existence of an arbitration agreement, but they do not override settled non-arbitrability principles or compel reference of a dispute governed by a special statutory forum chosen by the consumer. The same reasoning applies to a request for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461225