https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=38143 The ED sought advancement of a petition challenging a trial court order directing supply of chargesheet and digitised records of unrelied documents, arguing only a list should be provided at scrutiny. Accused wished to file replies; considering the court's board status and respondents' intent to respond, the hearing could not be pre poned. The court allowed electronic service of the ED's petition. The dispute arises from alleged irregularities in an excise policy implementation and concerns pre trial disclosure and procedural sequencing. en-us Fri, 21 Mar 2025 19:46:03 +0530 Fri, 21 Mar 2025 19:46:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=38143 The ED sought advancement of a petition challenging a trial court order directing supply of chargesheet and digitised records of unrelied documents, arguing only a list should be provided at scrutiny. Accused wished to file replies; considering the court's board status and respondents' intent to respond, the hearing could not be pre poned. The court allowed electronic service of the ED's petition. The dispute arises from alleged irregularities in an excise policy implementation and concerns pre trial disclosure and procedural sequencing. News - Fri, 21 Mar 2025 19:46:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=38143