https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42292 An order granting bail at the inception of a criminal prosecution was treated as amenable to revisional scrutiny and not barred as a mere interlocutory order under Section 397(2) CrPC. The court required reasons in writing for release on bail and found the impugned order cryptic and unsupported, making the grant unsustainable. On the consequences, the principal accused was directed into judicial custody for a limited period to aid investigation, the other accused were required to attend the investigating agency daily for one month, and the existing bail conditions were enhanced. en-us Thu, 30 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:53:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42292 An order granting bail at the inception of a criminal prosecution was treated as amenable to revisional scrutiny and not barred as a mere interlocutory order under Section 397(2) CrPC. The court required reasons in writing for release on bail and found the impugned order cryptic and unsupported, making the grant unsustainable. On the consequences, the principal accused was directed into judicial custody for a limited period to aid investigation, the other accused were required to attend the investigating agency daily for one month, and the existing bail conditions were enhanced. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 30 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42292