<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1410 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461218</link>
    <description>Penalty under Section 271AA was held not warranted where the Transfer Pricing Officer made no adjustment to the international transactions and the assessee&#039;s transfer pricing documentation was found sufficient for assessment purposes. The Tribunal followed the view taken in the assessee&#039;s earlier year and sustained deletion of the penalty on the basis that, absent any transfer pricing adjustment, the alleged non-maintenance of documentation did not justify levy of penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 19:21:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=808204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1410 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461218</link>
      <description>Penalty under Section 271AA was held not warranted where the Transfer Pricing Officer made no adjustment to the international transactions and the assessee&#039;s transfer pricing documentation was found sufficient for assessment purposes. The Tribunal followed the view taken in the assessee&#039;s earlier year and sustained deletion of the penalty on the basis that, absent any transfer pricing adjustment, the alleged non-maintenance of documentation did not justify levy of penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>