<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Procedure for launching Prosecution involving offences punishable under sections 276B, 276BB, and under sections 277, 278 in relation to sections 276B, 276BB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=68270</link>
    <description>For offences based on factual defaults under sections 276B/276BB and related provisions, the opinion of Prosecution Counsel need not be mandatorily obtained before passing the sanction order under section 279(1); however, the CIT must identify relevant person(s) as Principal Officer and consider or overrule any claim of reasonable cause before according sanction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2025 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=808097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Procedure for launching Prosecution involving offences punishable under sections 276B, 276BB, and under sections 277, 278 in relation to sections 276B, 276BB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=68270</link>
      <description>For offences based on factual defaults under sections 276B/276BB and related provisions, the opinion of Prosecution Counsel need not be mandatorily obtained before passing the sanction order under section 279(1); however, the CIT must identify relevant person(s) as Principal Officer and consider or overrule any claim of reasonable cause before according sanction.</description>
      <category>Circulars</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=68270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>