https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461208 A landlord's bona fide requirement for residential and business use was upheld on the evidence, and comparative hardship was treated as a factual issue already determined by the courts below. The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded the proper limits of revisional jurisdiction by reappreciating evidence and disturbing concurrent findings of fact. On that basis, the landlord's appeal was allowed, the tenant's appeal was dismissed, and eviction was decreed in respect of both portions of the building. en-us Fri, 06 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Sep 2025 10:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461208 A landlord's bona fide requirement for residential and business use was upheld on the evidence, and comparative hardship was treated as a factual issue already determined by the courts below. The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded the proper limits of revisional jurisdiction by reappreciating evidence and disturbing concurrent findings of fact. On that basis, the landlord's appeal was allowed, the tenant's appeal was dismissed, and eviction was decreed in respect of both portions of the building. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461208