<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Excise Duty Not Applicable on Ziking (Slag): Involuntary By-products Not Taxable as Goods</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86695</link>
    <description>The CESTAT ruled that Ziking (slag), a by-product emerging during Silico Manganese manufacture, is not subject to excise duty. Following precedents in Monnet Ispat and Haryana Steel cases, the Tribunal determined that by-products involuntarily produced during manufacturing are not excisable goods. The demand of Rs.23,52,292/- on Ziking sales was set aside. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the alleged shortage of Silico Manganese stock, finding that the verification was conducted merely on &quot;eye estimation basis,&quot; which was insufficient to establish a shortage. Consequently, the demand of Rs.6,42,584/- was also set aside. With no sustainable demands, the Tribunal ruled that no penalties were imposable on the appellants. Appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 08:25:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 08:25:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=807963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Excise Duty Not Applicable on Ziking (Slag): Involuntary By-products Not Taxable as Goods</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86695</link>
      <description>The CESTAT ruled that Ziking (slag), a by-product emerging during Silico Manganese manufacture, is not subject to excise duty. Following precedents in Monnet Ispat and Haryana Steel cases, the Tribunal determined that by-products involuntarily produced during manufacturing are not excisable goods. The demand of Rs.23,52,292/- on Ziking sales was set aside. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the alleged shortage of Silico Manganese stock, finding that the verification was conducted merely on &quot;eye estimation basis,&quot; which was insufficient to establish a shortage. Consequently, the demand of Rs.6,42,584/- was also set aside. With no sustainable demands, the Tribunal ruled that no penalties were imposable on the appellants. Appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 08:25:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>